The Covid Vaccine Damage Compensation Scheme is a sick joke. We've already learned that the overwhelming majority of those damaged by the clot-shot have been refused compensation, whilst the handful that have been granted compensation receive a fraction of that paid to the army of consultants brought in to reject them.
The shocking reality behind the UK’s Covid vaccine damage compensation scheme has been exposed by the Telegraph who reveal that a US-based consultancy firm has profited more from rejected claims than victims have received in payouts.
Freedom of Information (FOI) requests show that Crawford and Company, a global claims management firm headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, has received a staggering £27.2 million for assessing claims through the NHS’s Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS), yet only £24.3 million has been distributed to victims.
With nearly 13,000 medical assessments conducted, more than 98% of claims have been rejected, leaving thousands without compensation for life-altering conditions linked to the Covid 'vaccines'.
The Telegraph reports a culture of secrecy and a system rigged against the victim confirming what many had said all; that the system is deliberately obstructive, with the NHS running the scheme as a damage-limitation exercise with the overall aim to maintain the false narrative.
Strokes, Heart Attacks and Paralysis 'not severe enough' for compensation.
Many victims have been denied compensation on the basis that their injuries were not “severe enough”—despite suffering conditions like strokes, heart attacks, blood clots, spinal inflammation, and facial paralysis, conditions known to be linked to vaccines.
Rigged Criteria: Denied on Technicalities
Even those who can prove a direct link between their condition and the vaccine face another hurdle: the arbitrary disability threshold. Victims must be at least 60% disabled to qualify—an outdated and harsh requirement dating back to 2002, which remains unexplained by the NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA). Victims describe the process as “humiliating”, with their suffering dismissed by a faceless corporate entity.
Crawford & Co: A Troubling Reputation
Beyond its role in the VDPS, Crawford and Company has a disturbing track record. The firm holds a 1.4-star rating on Trustpilot, with widespread allegations of unfair claim denials, ignored medical evidence, and bureaucratic stonewalling.
The Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART), an independent group of medical professionals, warns that Crawford’s involvement in the compensation process raises serious ethical concerns:
“This company has a troubling reputation, with numerous reports of mismanagement and claims denials across various sectors.”
The Victims Speak Out
For those left to suffer without financial aid, the betrayal is devastating. One claimant, who suffered a stroke after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine, shared their frustration:
“I trusted the government. I did my part. Now, when I need help, they’ve left me in the dark.”
With thousands of applicants denied and no public explanation of assessment criteria, the VDPS appears designed to protect the government and corporations, not the victims.
The Fight for Transparency and Justice
With public outrage growing, pressure is mounting for a complete overhaul of the VDPS. Advocacy groups demand:
Full transparency in how claims are assessed
Independent oversight to prevent conflicts of interest
A lower disability threshold to reflect real-world suffering
A fairer, faster compensation process
The Covid Vaccine Compensation Scheme is just part of the official narrative around the 2020 plandemic. You can't compensate for a crime against humanity.
Related:
Comments