The Power of Occam's Razor: Unmasking State Narratives with Simple Truths
Over the past four years the Establishment have expected us to believe more and more outrageous lies. Many of these are cloaked in pseudoscience and at odds with common sense. We are expected to believe that women can have penises, that having no symptoms of a plague is in itself a symptom of it, and that cow farts are about to cause the apocalypse.
State sponsored lies have also infested the judiciary too: We are now expected to believe that it's the 'far-right' who are the biggest threat we face, and that Facebook Memes are now 'so serious' that even liking one could get you three years in prison.
Over time, these state-sponsored narratives not only appear to be becoming more and more outrageous but are expected to be accepted without question.
But blatant lies on their own aren’t enough, so these are often supplemented with other Government trickery such as as the argument from authority’, The misuse of statistics, the correlation and causation, as well as such things as Ad Homonyms and Straw Man arguments, happily resorted to by Blob supporters on the internet.
However, the government narrative completely crumbles when Occam's Razor is applied. We see how it reveals the truth every time it's applied in such diverse cases as the Southport attack, the vaccine mandates and even the Lucy Letby case.
What is Occam's Razor?
Occam's Razor is a problem-solving principle that suggests: when faced with multiple explanations the simplest one is usually the best. This doesn't mean the simplest answer is always correct, but that the answer with the fewest assumptions or complexities should be tested first.
Different Versions of Occam’s Razor
Classical Version: "Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity." This original version implies that unnecessary assumptions or elements should be avoided in any explanation.
Simplified Version: "The simplest solution is often the correct one." This version is popular in science and everyday decision-making, where simple solutions tend to have fewer errors or variables.
Modern Scientific Version: In science, Occam's Razor suggests that the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions is preferable until proven otherwise, balancing simplicity with explanatory power.
Logical/Philosophical Interpretation: This version focuses on parsimony in arguments, emphasising clarity and brevity. Arguments should not be more complex than necessary to avoid confusion and misinterpretation.
Example of Using Occam’s Razor
Let’s say you come home to find a puddle of water on your kitchen floor. There are a few possible explanations:
Explanation A: The tap has a leak.
Explanation B: Someone broke in, turned on the tap, and left.
Explanation C: A pipe burst, and the water only pooled in that one specific spot.
The simplicity of Occam's Razor makes it a powerful tool for deconstructing official narratives. In an age where state-sponsored information often challenges basic intuition, citizens are encouraged to question and analyse.
Applying Occam’s Razor to the Southport Attack Narrative
During the Southport attacks, authorities quickly advanced the story that this was an isolated act by a Welsh Christian suffering from mental health issues. This explanation made no sense as the significant patterns of the attack all fitted with previous attacks perpetrated by Muslims against white girls at pop concerts. Here, then are the two possible explanations.
Random Violence Committed by a Welshman who was a devout Christian and had randomly attacked the victims whilst having a mental health crisis.
An Islamic Terrorist Attack: This explanation, whilst unpalatable to authorities, recognises the obvious similarities in victims, methods, and weaponry with that of dozens of other Islamic Terrorist attacks across Europe.
Applying Occam's Razor exposes the ridiculousness of the Government's narrative, It was obviously entirely and knowingly false. Everybody automatically applied Occam's Razor even if they didn't know it, but for some, posting the answer caused them to be imprisoned. Even though they had been right all along, and everyone knew they were, the Government still locked them up. It had all the hallmarks of an Islamic terror attack whilst the alternative, which the Government insisted you believe, involved a series of random factors, unlikely scenarios and unnecessarily convoluted claims whilst dismissing the obvious parallels.
Occam’s Razor and the Lucy Letby Case
Lucy Letby, a former nurse, was convicted of murdering seven babies following the death of the infants whilst she was working in the Neonatal unit where they died. Letby was convicted of their murders despite there being no hard evidence against her. No eye witnesses, no confession, no fingerprints, DNA or CCTV evidence. There was also no motive, or Modus Operandi either. The babies had died, but there was no evidence that foul play was involved. The prosecution narrative relied entirely on circumstantial evidence. Applying Occam's Razor:
Natural Causes or Infection: Given the vulnerability of the infants (all of whom were premature and had resulting serious health conditions), The babies then would have already had a high-risk of dying. During the time several babies died an undetected infection was later discovered to be spreading through the hospital a far more likely cause of death based on hospital statistics.
Medical Error or Incompetence: Overworked or overwhelmed staff could inadvertently make critical mistakes, leading to higher-than-average mortality. The neonatal ward had already come under scrutiny from the CQC who had 'downgraded' the ward due to poor performance. Medical Error is also the third biggest killer of patients after heart disease and cancer according to John Hopkins University.
Intentional Murder by an undetected Serial Killer: The most complex explanation, involving a highly improbable scenario of a nurse committing multiple murders in a high-surveillance environment without leaving a single piece of hard evidence for any of them became the 'official' narrative that convicted Lucy Letby.
Occam’s Razor points to the first two explanations—natural causes or potential incompetence, as more likely scenarios. Although horrifying, medical mishaps are not uncommon in high-stakes neonatal care. whilst infections caught whilst in hospital kill many more people than is widely acknowledged. Instead of accepting one or both of these simple and common causes, we are expected to perform a load of mental gymnastics to arrive at the idea Lucy Letby murdered those babies, without being seen or leaving a single piece of evidence for any of them.
2021's Myocarditis and Turbo Cancer Rise
From April 2021 hospitals saw an unprecedented rise heart attacks and Cancer rates with excess deaths routinely topping 1500 people a week, month after month. After initially denial that there was anything to see, the government put forward a number of explanations these included.
Caused by Covid-19 Virus: Covid-19 a supposed pneumonia had triggered the sudden rise in myocarditis in 2021, even though it had not been known to have caused a single incidence of it during the whole of 2020, when it was supposed to be at it's peak.
Delayed Medical Diagnosis: Lockdowns and an overwhelmed health services saw patients missing screenings, appointments and diagnosis and this was an unexpected consequence of that.
Public's Poor Health Choices During Lockdown: Lifestyle choices may have worsened due to increased stress, poor diet, and lack of physical activity during lockdowns.
Adverse Reactions to an Experimental Vaccine that was Given in 2021: Every age-group vaccinated in 2021 was reported to have had unprecedented rises in both Myocarditis and onset of stage 4 cancers. Myocarditis and Pericarditis not only showed in unprecedented numbers during 2021 but in age-groups not normally effected by such illnesses. Myocarditis and Pericarditis were most commonly reported in the 14 days after a booster shot was administered whilst turbo cancers were seen in patients who had received two or more booster shots.
According to Occam’s Razor, explanations involving vaccine side effects would be the most straightforward. Their proximity to the subsequent deaths and serious injuries, together with lack of any robust long term safety data, all point to it being the cause.
Again, the simpler explanation is the right one. If you start having to do lots of mental gymnastics to arrive at an answer, it's probably the wrong one. If the government are expecting you to do that, then it'll definitely be the wrong one. It's be propaganda.
The simplicity of Occam's Razor makes it a powerful tool for deconstructing official narratives. In an age where state-sponsored information often challenges basic intuition and common sense, it's wise to question everything.
Comments